Empowering Science Education Through Real-World Learning: Co-creation of Knowledge in Small-Scale, Community-Driven Projects

Empowering Science Education Through Real-World Learning: Co-creation of Knowledge in Small-Scale, Community-Driven Projects


What is this Research About?

Existing knowledge systems are diverse. They include indigenous worldviews and the Western knowledge system. Indigenous worldviews highlight participation, community engagement, and sustainability. Western approaches to education can be driven by large industries, be top-down (e.g., lecture-based), and rely on solving hypothetical problems. Scholars suggest that decolonizing education involves examining power structures, what is taught, and how it is taught. Research shows that active learning is more effective than passive learning. In this study, the researchers set up a small-scale, collaborative, community-led engineering project in which students co-created knowledge with community members. The researchers investigated students’ perceptions of their learning experiences. 

What did the Researchers Do?

The researchers revised an engineering design project. They replaced a commercially driven design project with a relevant, small-scale collaborative one with a local community group. The project was community driven. The community group made all final decisions about the project. One hundred and twenty undergraduate students took the one-semester course. Students co-created knowledge with and for the community members. Ten students volunteered to be interviewed about their learning experiences. The researchers constructed themes out of the volunteers’ feedback. 

What did the Researchers Find?

Most students reported learning benefits. Students were stimulated and motivated by the local context (e.g., “… that sparks my imagination.”). They found it relatable and enjoyable. Students got clearer about the role of engineers within society, power structures, and decision-making (e.g., “We weren’t dealing with just some plant somewhere or this big corporate thing. […] You can’t just go in and design whatever you want and leave it, you need to think about the people you’re impacting.”) Students learned that engineers use their skills in service to others. Students found that textbooks and the internet were sometimes insufficient to inform decisions about the applied, small-scale project. Student learning was enhanced by co-creating knowledge. 

→ How to Implement this Research in Your Classroom

The researchers wanted to know how student learning was impacted by including a locally relevant, community-driven design project in the engineering curriculum. They studied students’ thoughts and feelings from recorded interviews. Students reported enhanced learning, more enjoyment, deeper awareness of their professional role, appreciation for constraints within current engineering knowledge, and appreciation for stakeholders in the collaborative process. To improve teaching, instructors can consider incorporating:  

  • active learning, community engagement, collaborations, locally relevant projects, community-driven projects, balancing industry and community needs, and student reflections on their learning experience 

→  Citation

Agrawal, A., & Heydenrych, H. (2024). An epistemic shift: Exploring students’ learning experiences with a decolonisation initiative in an engineering course. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2024.2303023 

→  Keywords

  • Chemical Engineering
  • Community-Driven Course Project
  • Decolonizing Curriculum 

Creative Commons by logo This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Canada License


Snapshot Writer: Carol Tinga

Snapshot Publication Date: 2024


Contact Us

 

E-mail the Office of Teaching and Learning (otl@uoguelph.ca) with any questions related to your teaching and learning needs.